An Unusual Conservative Perception of Covid
Ideology can be such a blinding and narrow-minded state of mind, individual or collective. Accurate history informs us that plagues and pandemics have devastated the world several times and for millennia. Long before socialism and capitalism came into existence. And humanity is still here. But not for the excessive passions that drive ideology. My conservative friends of Nigerian origin seem to think otherwise.
Nevertheless, I find it bemusing that Africans who have nothing of comparative pride to conserve in a globalised world are self-proclaimed diehard conservatives. More so, the ones that ever deny everyday realities as gallant defenders of their beloved ideology. There is nothing wrong with adopting ideas and beliefs. As long as they are useful and corresponding to one’s existence. I would like to know what African conservatives conserve. From where I stand, it is just a “cut and paste” ideology. One that cannot graft well into the African experience.
In February 2007, I went to the Peak District, the UK, for a weekend break with my partner. I stumbled upon Eyam (pronounced Eem), a tiny village in Derbyshire, with a distinguished place in British history. Under the leadership of a pastor, a wagon carrying fabric from London brought the Great Plague to Eyam; the Bubonic started near there. When the symptoms and the first deaths occurred, the pastor, William Mompesson, demanded the village adopt self-isolation from the rest of Derbyshire to prevent its spread. Food and supplies for the villagers had to be delivered without human contact, i.e. as drop-offs. It was a great sacrifice and prevented the Plague from spreading into that region, saving thousands or millions of lives. But many died in Eyam, paying the cost of preservation. One would think that in a pandemic, preservation would take priority over conservation.
Moreover, the deviant part of the story was an LSE free-market economist published a paper on their website denying the Plague event in Eyam using ration choice and free-market argumentation. He regarded the story as fiction, if not apocryphal. He argued people are too selfish to sacrifice for others! Perhaps human beings are such expedient spontaneous maximisers they have no sense of synergy teamwork, collaboration or cooperation in times of danger, disaster or distress. There are few historical deniers who are not conservatives; conservatives have as routine, denied the holocaust, ethnic cleansing, slavery, planned famine. European and American conservatives have things to “conserve”; their societies, way of life, bloodlines, wealth, rights, privileges, and language. Now my African friends, in the name of “conservatism” deny the realities of the Covid-19 pandemic as if it conserves something for them.
The real common sense about Covid-19 is simple. The world has learned from the techniques and policies found in recorded history that helped overcome pandemics and epidemics in the past. Social distancing, lockdowns, burning of contaminated fabrics (smallpox), improved sanitation, sterilisation, disinfection, use of condoms, vaccinations, new and old medicines, folk treatments are the more obvious solutions. My conservative friends insist that the Covid-19 lockdowns were pure socialist policy. Their evidence for such a conclusion is fallacious. Prominent citizens of countries on the Left and Right of the political spectrum have supported and opposed the lockdown. With equal fervour, though for different reasons.
Some even went as far as saying that staying at home on furlough during the Covid-19 crisis, which is ongoing, is a socialist program. These guys are unaware that a socialist is a worker’s ideology for working people. Communist/socialist countries by law sent those who refused to work in jail for two years in the USSR and recidivists ended up in Siberian gulags! The Soviet Union did not become a global superpower with an idle population.
Nevertheless, I would like to read any text or scrolls that demonstrate catallaxy, deregulation, privatisation, spontaneous maximisation, price signalling, contested markets, or methodological individualism. The magic wands of conservatism and free markets are instruments for overcoming plagues. Or how neoliberalism, liberal capitalism, social democracy, socialism, communism all with justice insinuate themselves on a remorseless plague. Such will be interesting.
Whatever happened to human life first? Then the living can implement or run whatever system they choose for themselves. No! Conservative ideals are far too important, much more important than life itself. Yeah.
Grimot Nane