Fraternities Are Viruses in Nigeria – The Claims
There are many “university campus grown fraternities” (UCGFs) in Nigeria today, some old and some new, but they all claim to be the “saviours” of the Nigerian society. Their claims for existence and continuity are noble but false. These fraternities now have websites, if visited, present the public with their uninspiring PR. It showcases their equivalents of the Ten Commandments; prescriptions for a just, moral or egalitarian society; apocryphal histories; charities and do-gooding; their claims to elitism and their critiques of the government. You cannot convince non-believers about such.
We named no names, neither of fraternities nor of individuals in public office only because it is unnecessary. If UCGFs one day take over Nigeria, we should expect that Nigeria will be worse off in the governance arena than it is today. Still, no leader or administrator or group of concerned Nigerians will do anything about such. Why should they?
Claims and fulfilling them are an essential tool used by UCGFs to justify their existence to themselves and the public. The emphatic repetition of their claims about themselves as freedom fighters. Or reformers of society. And membership of their noble organisation. Or having humanitarian intentions. And being honest and disciplined are constant within. Such claims are lies and delusions that lack even imaginary evidence. But their repetition makes them become constant thoughts in the minds of members.
Another interesting claim of UCGFs is its unique and momentous birthing. The founders of these UCGS were a few young undergraduates or postgraduate students and sometimes academics. Founding members were, as a rule, immortalised by qualifying their numbers with superlative qualifiers. The Three Musketeers (from a 19th-century adventure story). And The Fantastic Four (from an American children’s comic book). The Famous Five (from a British children’s novel);. Six of Best (from Battle, a British war comic). The Magnificent Seven (from a classic Hollywood Western); and the Great Eight (Mao’s team of revolutionaries). A fictitious yarn designed to instruct the memory of the founders would back each of these attributes up.
Then there are the claims of their ideals. The ideals are supposed to govern their behaviour, conduct or approach to life. In practice, any ardent practitioner of such ideals soon gets into trouble. The unspoken Ideal they enforce is “do not practise these Ideals with conscientiousness, why die before your time?” The antinomy is so visible. Thus, we see the trivialisation of the ideals in introducing recruitment /conditioning tools and for public relations. Rookies have a choice; ignore the ideals and follow the leader or clique, or be a purist and suffer constant humiliation. It is not much of a choice—many leave.
UCGFs have derogatory names for non-members, which is evidence of their self-ascription of elitism or superiority. Let us say such a name is “ogre”. Albert Einstein, Chinua Achebe, Malcolm X, Steve Jobs and Barack Obama would be and take a belittling as thinking as ogres. Thinking like an ogre is an inferior thought. Chimamanda Adichie, Indira Gandhi, Shoshana Zuboff and Lise Meitner would be ogresses. One can see how simple names can foster groupthink and a sense of superiority among UCGF members. “They versus Us” is a prevalent paralogism of theirs.
If a Murtala Mohammed-like head of state were in power today, he would ban UCGFs, members and other secret society members from holding public office unless perhaps they have renounced by legal procedure their membership. However, Murtala Mohammed got assassinated almost forty years ago. Even President Muhammadu Buhari does not have UCGFs on his radar on his anti-corruption mission.
Many UCGFs make the brazen claim they have “brothers” who are governors, senators, ministers. And commissioners, professors, vice-chancellors, ambassadors, generals, priests, corporate executives and so on in their ranks. The public should ask who heads these fraternities. If they and these public officials they boast about are exemplary or not? Are they not working for the narrow interests of their bosses and founders? In fact, many of the people they boast are their members dissociated from them decades ago.
A casual scan of these UCGF groomed public officials in office would be unmistakable when it unveils they are no less disposed to corruption or malfeasance. And no less greedy or mediocre than the non-fraternity public officials. From local government to the federal level, these guys, with few exceptions, demonstrate a sheer proclivity for corrupt practices. And as a collective, they are now part of distributive special interest groups.
Such ‘doublespeak‘ by UCGFs about their mission and the honour list of their members enjoys much tolerance in Nigeria. Even when matched against the realities of their routine practices because it is a society where “nobody cares”. Well, unless their is an interruption or termination to their source of income is or taken away.
UCGF members expect nepotism and favouritism to bring them help and opportunity when their “brother” gets into public office. Incorruptible fraternity members who get into office soon experience ostracism by their “brothers”. The arguments tendered to reduce them as being selfish, unhelpful, foolish, overzealous in their job and not being a genuine member. The corrupt fraternity member who splurges on his “brothers” is their favoured and blessed hero, and such heroes abound. Such behaviour nullifies the shoddy self-tributes they have on their websites.
No one can with honesty say they did not see the UCFGs coming. Their claims might be more persuasive than many expect. Claims have gotten them this far. Why can they not update them and achieve their goals? They are already here, but like initial viral infections, they take time to multiply and take over the host. Since when have viruses been the saviours of the hosts they colonise?
Claims, claims, claims! Some are listening. Are you?
Grimot Nane
